Commit Graph
3 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Marc Billow 07061c734d Fix more pre-existing ty diagnostics in test files
Continues narrowing SamsungEntityDescription accesses to the correct
subclass and asserting Optional write_fn/match_fn/exists_fn fields are
set before calling them, per the pattern established in the previous
commit.
2026-08-03 00:03:08 +00:00
Marc Billow daf7e3787f Add ruff (lint + format) and ty (type checking) to the project
Adds [tool.ruff] and [tool.ty] config to pyproject.toml with a curated
ruff rule set (E, F, W, I, UP, B, C4, SIM, RUF, ASYNC, LOG, G, PIE, RET,
PERF, N), pins ruff/ty in requirements-dev.txt, reformats the whole tree
with `ruff format`, and fixes the pre-existing lint and type-check debt
those tools surfaced so both run clean.

Production-code type fixes include: HA's ConfigFlowResult vs. the
generic FlowResult in config_flow.py, narrowing BoundEntity.desc to its
platform-specific subclass (SelectDesc/NumberDesc/SensorDesc/etc.) via
cast() instead of an unchecked annotation, converting HA device_class
strings to their proper enum types, a resolve_registry callback typed
as `object` instead of `DeviceRegistry | None`, and a couple of other
narrow correctness fixes (CA key type validation, an index-out-of-bounds
false positive from an empty-tuple fallback, a bool/dict argument swap).

Test-file fixes are mechanical: narrowing SamsungEntityDescription to
the correct subclass via isinstance()/cast() before accessing
subclass-only fields, and asserting Optional write_fn/unit_fn fields
are set before calling them.
2026-08-02 23:56:38 +00:00
Marc Billow 5bbc7aeece fix(air_dresser): bind /buzzersound/vs/0 on the TP1_21 board (#208)
DA_DF_TP1_21_COMMON reports a plain {setBuzzerSound, supportedFinishSound}
buzzersound resource -- the same shape laundry.BUZZER_SOUND already
handles for washers/dryers -- but it was unbound because the air_dresser
registry never included that capability. Add it, and lock the board in
with a scrubbed fixture, golden, and capability tests.

The reporter's actual complaint (course cycles showing as raw codes) is
a labelling gap, not a coverage one: this board's course table has no
code->name mapping anywhere in the dump, same as issue #162's board, so
there's nothing to bind here -- it needs a reporter to identify the
codes before they can be named in translations.
2026-07-31 02:03:32 +00:00