`/option/autoclean/vs/0` carries three fields and only `settingStatus` was read.
That one says the feature is enabled, which it is whether or not the unit is
drying right now, so nothing reported an actual cycle.
settingStatus: On <- the existing auto_clean switch
status: Stop supportedStatus: [Start, Stop]
progress: 0
Adds a binary sensor for `status` and a percentage sensor for `progress`.
Measured on a TP1X_DA-AC-CAC-01001, sampling the resource every eight seconds
across a cycle: `Start` with progress 98 while it ran, then `Stop` with progress 0
the moment it finished. The percentage matches the figure the appliance shows on
its own display, checked against 55% mid-run.
Golden state keys updated for the 18 fixtures that bind AUTO_CLEAN. The change is
additive — no key was removed from any of them.
Full suite passes (1070 tests, Python 3.13 via requirements-dev.txt).
CI caught it: 8 pre-existing AC fixtures also carry genuine SmartCoolClean_/
ProgressSmartClean_ tokens in /mode/vs/0 (lnx_rac_heatpump, ara_ww_tp1_22,
windfree_oscillation, tp1x_rac_01001, fac_bora, fac_bora_2in1,
fac_bora_205_flat, cac), so odor_controller_active/odor_controller_progress
now correctly bind there too -- their golden state_keys lists just hadn't
been regenerated. Verified against the actual downloaded CI job log.
This board (a floor-standing + wall-mounted indoor unit pair sharing one
outdoor unit and one local IP) reports no oneUiVersion and carries the
'_FAC_' modelNum token, which no existing routing rule matched -- it fell
back to 'unknown' and exposed nothing but a power switch, with no climate
entity generated at all (both issues' reported symptom).
Once routed to the existing airconditioner registry, it binds cleanly
against the exact same CLIMATE composite every other room-AC family uses --
same Cool/Dry/Wind/AIComfort mode vocabulary, same wind-strength/humidity/
filter/energy resource shapes already modeled. Only two hrefs are unique to
this board: /subdevices/vs/0 (an opaque paired-subdevice id list -- issue
#150 asked whether the second indoor unit can be controlled separately;
it can't through this or any other resource in the dump, the same
"remote device ids, not locally actionable" role as the existing
/remotedeviceinfo/vs/0 ignore) and /runn/vs/0 (a single undocumented int
with no supported-values list to interpret). Both added to _AC_IGNORED
rather than guessed at.
Geunwon Mo