Issue #376 reported Korean UI labels for 21 washer (Table_02) and 18
dryer (Table_03) codes that had no translation and were rendering as
raw hex in the UI, from a WF21T6500KV washer (DA_WM_A51_20_COMMON) and
DV19T8745BV dryer (DA_WM_TP1_21_COMMON).
Cross-checked every reported code against translations/ko.json before
translating anything: several share their exact Korean text with a
code the catalog already has a confirmed label for (washer '19'/'AI
맞춤세탁' matches '2b'/'69'; dryer '3a'/'살균건조' matches '21'; dryer
'3c'/'피트니스' even matches washer '2f', a cross-table reuse; etc.) --
those reuse the established label instead of a fresh translation. The
rest (Wool/Lingerie, Boil Wash, Soft Bubble, Padding Care, and others
with no catalog precedent) are new translations of the reporter's
Korean text.
One code is deliberately NOT applied: washer '06' ('이불', Bedding per
this report) conflicts with 'XXL Laundry', already locked in by
test_confirmed_washer_table_02_missing_course_names (issue #342). Two
reports of the same nominal Table_02 disagreeing on one code is a real
discrepancy, not a wording question -- left alone pending the reporter
(or another Table_02 owner) confirming which device's '06' is actually
wrong, same caution as the existing '24'/'33' transposition history
(issue #343).
Added to all 7 locale catalogs (en/de/es/it/cs/nl/ko), not just
English: HA falls back to English for any key a locale is missing, so
translations/en.json alone would still pass
test_every_language_mirrors_the_english_catalog's topology check while
leaving every other locale showing English text for these codes.
Tests: two new tests lock in the English labels and, for every reused
code, that every locale's label actually matches its anchor code (not
just English) -- the same gap issue #343 fell through, since the
topology test alone can't catch a locale-specific mistranslation.
Full suite (1575 tests), ruff, and ty all pass.
Marc Billow
a18663d5e0